Information Filled Under 'The Business of IP' Category
BLOG: Interviews with top CIPOs available to view Friday, July 30th, 2010
During the IP Business Congress in Munich last month we conducted a number of video interviews with speakers and delegates which are now available to view. The interviewees discuss their experiences of holding the Chief IP Officer role, or equivalent, and offer their advice to aspiring CIPOs looking to convince their boards of directors to sit up and take notice of the potential value of their intellectual property. The videos can be found on the new CIPO section of the IAM website – a unique portal designed for and about the people responsible for the creation, management and exploitation of corporate…
See the article here:
BLOG: Interviews with top CIPOs available to view
A world class speaking faculty of IP thought leaders debated with delegates from around the word at the third IP Business Congress, held this year in Munich. Creating value from IP and other intangible assets was the theme of the event, and what is abundantly clear is just how many possibilities there now are to do this for those willing to think creatively about what they own.
Read the rest here:
ARTICLE: Dateline Munich
The use of competitors’ names in keyword advertising is an emerging area of the law of trademarks and passing off, but has not received judicial consideration in Canada until now. The British Columbia Supreme Court recently considered the issue of confusion as it has been developed in trademark jurisprudence when deciding whether the use of such keywords constituted misleading advertising.
Read this article:
REPORT: Be wary of paid advertisements: keyword advertising in Canada
On 12th July, US President Barack Obama wrote to Nancy Pelosi, Speaker of the House of Representatives, requesting that she spearhead efforts to ensure additional funding for the US Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).
Read more from the original source:
ARTICLE: Barack Obama’s powerful IP lesson for Europe
Recent decisions in the US and Europe concerning the patentability of software and business methods may have provided greater clarity, but they have not brought further harmony. This has significant implications for portfolio management strategies.
Here is the original post:
ARTICLE: Navigating the software and business method maze
The next issue of IAM will be out and ready to view online next week. One of the articles we are running is based on interviews done with chief IP officers at the recent IP Business Congress . Reporter Sara-Jayne Clover asked a number of the CIPOs who joined us in Munich to share their experiences of how they got their company boards to take a new look at IP as a value generator, rather than just as a cost
See the article here:
BLOG: IP value creation at IBM and Microsoft – compare and contrast
Below is a guest blog from David Kappos, Director of the USPTO, in which he explains why the office is embracing the Patent Prosecution Highway and why he believes it offers significant benefits to patent applicants. Fast Track Examination of Applications on the Patent Prosecution Highway Patent backlogs are a problem for every patent office in the world and reducing the duplication of work among patent offices is key to reducing patent pendency. Work sharing arrangements enable applications filed in multiple jurisdictions to be fast-tracked based on another office’s work product–such as allowances or search reports–while streamlining patent processing among…
Original post:
BLOG: IAM Exclusive – David Kappos writes on the Patent Prosecution Highway
In its long-awaited decision in Bilski v Kappos, the Supreme Court has held that the “machine or transformation” test is not the exclusive test for determining whether a claimed process is eligible for patenting under Section 101 of the patent statute. The opinion effectively overrules the Federal Circuit’s earlier decision.
View original post here:
REPORT: Bilski: "machine or transformation" not exclusive test for patentable processes
The Supreme People’s Court has issued the Opinion on Several Issues Regarding Administrative Adjudication of Trademark Grant and Confirmation. The opinion lays down certain general guidelines – for example, widespread use of a trademark is a factor in favour of granting or maintaining its exclusive rights, and vice versa.
Read the original:
REPORT: Judicial opinion to clarify certain trademark issues
Innovative Australian companies that do business in the United States can take comfort from the recent US Supreme Court decision in Bilski, which confirmed the availability of patent rights for processes generally and did not exclude business processes and methods.
Here is the original post:
REPORT: Why the Bilski decision matters in Australia
This morning I got a call from Paul Conroy at the press office of the UK IP Office in response to the blog I posted yesterday about the British government’s decision to axe the Strategic Advisory Board for Intellectual Property (SABIP) as part of a drive to reduce overall expenditure.
See the article here:
BLOG: When it comes to IP and innovation in the UK (and elsewhere), deeds count, not words
Vince Cable, the UK’s Business Secretary, has announced that the Stategic Advisory Board for Intellectual Property (SABIP) is to be closed down and its competences assumed by the IP Office. The move comes as the government seeks to reduce costs. Given that since it came to power the Conservative/Liberal Democrat coalition has made it clear that it is making deficit reduction its number one priority, today’s news is not a huge surprise.
Go here to see the original:
BLOG: The UK government abolishes IP thinktank as part of deficit-reduction effort
… the PTO suffers from serious deficiencies in staffing, resources, and examination procedures that hamper its ability to conduct the sort of due diligence in patent applications that is required today. Clearly something must be done about this problem if we want to ensure the integrity of the intellectual property system in the United States
See the original post:
BLOG: Some things never change
The Waxman-Hatch Act offers opportunities to manufacturers of both brand and generic drugs in terms of market entry and exclusivity periods. A canny and fluid litigation strategy can help parties to take best advantage of the provisions available.
Continued here:
REPORT: Waxman-Hatch litigation strategies for generic and brand companies
I got the following email from the IAM blog’s old friend Nir Kossovsky today. I post it without comment, but invite others to have a say if they so wish: Recently, you posted on your blog a recap of an Ocean Tomo press release reporting that the intangible asset fraction of the average S&P500 Composite Index constituent company had climbed to 82% of market cap. Meanwhile, we reported on the Intangible Asset Finance Society blog, Mission Intangible, that the intangible asset fraction of the median public company traded on the major western markets had levelled out at 65% of market cap –…
Read this article:
BLOG: Intangible value and the herd instinct
So, just a fortnight after theBilski case was decided by the Supreme Court comes the news that NTP – of BlackBerry fame – is to sue a group of six leading IT companies, including Microsoft, Google, Apple and Motorola. It accuses them of infringing patents relating to wireless email transmissions. As all readers of this blog know, NTP successfully sued RIM, the maker of the Blackberry, winning a settlement of $612.5 million in 2006 after protracted wrangling both in and out of court.
Original post:
BLOG: Why has NTP gone on the attack now?
On the face of it, the news that Google has had its licence to operate in China renewed by the country’s government looks like a major victory for the company. As far as I can see, it will still be refusing to co-operate with censorship and related requirements that had previously been demanded of it. I can’t help feeling that if this really is the case, Google is going to reap a major reputational benefit that could well translate into something that is cash tangible
See the original post here:
BLOG: Google gets green light to stay in China, now the government must trust its citizens
After the Bilski decision was rendered by the Supreme Court, the USPTO issued a press release , stating that the PTO “will be issuing guidance further interpreting the decision as soon as possible” and that the PTO will be issuing interim guidance for the examining corps in the meantime. The interim guidelines state that the machine-or-transformation test should continue to be used as a “tool”, but if there is no “clear indication” that the invention is something other than an abstract idea, the examiners should reject the application.
BLOG: Why Micron matters Wednesday, July 7th, 2010It does not take more than a quick perusal of the IAM blog’s top stories of June 2010 to see that the series of pieces we ran on Micron during the early part of that month struck quite a few chords. Just to recap, John Desmarais – who had previously acted as an outside patent counsel for the company – told Bloomberg that he had bought a substantial portfolio of patents from Micron which he was now going to seek to monetise through an NPE named Round Rock
Read more:
BLOG: Why Micron matters
The Federal Circuit has affirmed the Eastern District of Virginia’s grant of summary judgment of no liability for false patent marking in favour of defendant Solo Cup Company in Pequignot v Solo Cup Co. The decision should help to limit exposure of patent owners to the flood of qui tam false marking lawsuits filed since last year’s decision in Forest Group, Inc v Bon Tool Co.
Read this article:
REPORT: Federal Circuit decision likely to limit patent owner liability for false marking
This much we know: a company will usually own many intangible assets, from patents and know-how, through brands, to customer lists and relationships; the way that it uses these often has a significant bearing on its overall performance; it would be very helpful for a company’s shareholders and potential investors to have a proper handle on intangibles so that they can judge its management; but it is very hard for shareholders, actual and potential, to get such a handle because intangibles are very rarely spoken about by companies; this is because most company managements do not think that much about them…
Link:
BLOG: Valuing intangibles to get mainstream board and investor buy-in – is this the way? …
The European Commission has published a draft regulation that would allow applications for the proposed EU patent to be submitted to the EPO in just one of the office’s official languages – English, French and German. The claims would have to be translated into the other two languages
Read more:
BLOG: Commission submits EU patent translation proposals, but only "a miracle" will see them fly
The opinion is out – as expected, the SCOTUS held Bilski’s application was not statutory subject matter: Petitioners’ remaining claims are broad examples of how hedging can be used in commodities and energy markets. Flook established that limiting an abstract idea to one field of use or adding token post solution components did not make the concept patentable
Read more:
(Finally!) The Bilski Decision Arrives
The US is the home of intangible value, according to a report just released by Ocean Tomo. Research published by the intellectual capital merchant bank (it used to call itself an IP merchant bank, when did that change?), claims that the implied intangible asset value of the S&P 500 reached 81% in 2009. This compares to 70% in EU markets, 73.5% in China and just 35.8% in Japan.
BLOG: Commission explores the possibility of creating a market for IP rights in Europe Thursday, June 17th, 2010Today is deadline day for interested parties to submit tenders for a service contract from the European Commission to look into the creation of a financial market for IP rights in the European Union. The aim is to explore the possibility of creating structures that would allow for much greater transparency in the buying and selling of IP; something that would create much greater predictability and, therefore, more likelihood that the true value of IP rights can be fully exploited by companies in Europe. Part 4 of the tender document explains why the Commission believes such a study is important:…
Read the original post:
BLOG: Commission explores the possibility of creating a market for IP rights in Europe
USPTO management has worked with representatives of the patent examiners union (POPA) to establish a proposal to “better align the performance standards for patent examiners with the USPTO’s goals for increasing quality in patent examination and reducing the backlog of pending patent applications.” If adopted, the changes would be the first major revision to the patent examiners’ performance appraisal plan (PAP) since 1986.
Read this article:
USPTO Close to Agreement With POPA to Overhaul Performance Review for Examiners
A dispute that has raged between mobile phone makers Motorola and Research in Motion (RIM) for more than two years was resolved last Friday with a cross-licensing deal. The two mobile telephone giants had been locked in litigation since a long-standing licensing deal expired in December 2007 and they were unable to reach a new agreement
Original post:
BLOG: Is it time for RIM to learn the ADR lesson?